Period poverty surveyed
Print
Despite progress in tackling period poverty, many vulnerable Australians remain underserved.
Period poverty, or the lack of access to menstrual products, forces people to rely on unsafe alternatives such as old clothes or towels, often accompanied by social stigma and lost opportunities at school or work.
While public schools across Australia now provide free menstrual products, recent expansions aim to reach more people.
The Victorian Government plans vending machines in public spaces, while the ACT Government will supply products in health services, courts, and child centres.
However, a recent Burnet Institute study, has found that these initiatives do not fully address the needs of marginalised groups.
The study shows that individuals experiencing severe product insecurity, such as those living in poverty or homelessness, face significant barriers.
“People who can’t afford period products often have connections with social services like food banks and community centres, so collaborating with these services is an effective way of reaching them,” said researcher Alexandra Head.
Interviews with people aged 18–45 from diverse groups, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals, gender-diverse people, and those with disabilities, revealed recurring challenges: stigma, inadequate privacy, and lack of product choice.
Many said they avoid collecting products in public spaces due to discomfort or fear of judgement.
The study calls for a mix of distribution strategies. While vending machines in libraries and train stations were seen as useful, direct-to-home delivery and partnerships with social services were considered more effective for those facing severe insecurity.
Participants also stressed the importance of product variety, including reusable options like menstrual cups, and suggested providing pain relief items.
Privacy and accessibility were critical concerns. Many preferred discrete distribution methods, such as plain packaging for deliveries or vending machines in gender-neutral bathrooms.
Participants called for education and advocacy to address stigma and normalise menstruation.
They suggested incorporating menstrual health information into product initiatives and campaigns targeting men and boys. These measures, they argued, could combat stigma and promote broader acceptance.
